Nevertheless, citation counts may accrue too slowly for use in some formal and informal evaluations. %X Medical research is highly funded and often expensive and so is particularly important to evaluate effectively. %T Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields %J Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology Readership followed either a lognormal or a hooked power law distribution, whereas citations always followed a hooked power law, showing that the two may have underlying differences. Based on a sample of 332,975 articles from 2009 in 45 medical fields in Scopus, citation counts correlated strongly (about 0.7 78% of articles had at least one reader) with Mendeley readership counts (from the new version 1 applications programming interface API) in almost all fields, with one minor exception, and the correlations tended to decrease slightly when student readers were excluded. This article assesses whether one such altmetric, Mendeley readership counts, correlates strongly with citation counts across all medical fields, whether the relationship is stronger if student readers are excluded, and whether they are distributed similarly to citation counts. It is therefore important to investigate whether alternative metrics could be used as substitutes.
Medical research is highly funded and often expensive and so is particularly important to evaluate effectively.
0 kommentar(er)
